Friday, March 16, 2018

blue and ivory


The phrase “so it goes” encompasses the attitude of Billy Pilgrim and the Tralfamadorians, particularly about wars and the bad parts of life. It represents their views of time and gives detachment and inevitability to any death for Billy. Because the phrase is used to describe the death of anything, from prisoners to a half-full bottle of champagne, it assigns a certain equality (and therefore loss) to any death. It also shows how disturbingly easy it is for Billy to process death and immediately dissociate with it.

Another phrase that is repeated often in a variety of situations, both in the war and out of it to show and critique Tralfamadorian thinking is “blue and ivory”. The first time the phrase is used is after the plane crash, when Billy is writing a letter to a newspaper about Tralfamadore. It was cold, he was in the cellar, and, “He was barefoot, and still in his pajamas and a bathrobe, though it was late afternoon. His bare feet were blue and ivory” (Vonnegut 28). Later, Barbara visits Billy, but can’t find him: “Billy didn’t answer her, so she was nearly hysterical, expecting to find his corpse” (Vonnegut 28).
The next time “blue and ivory” is used is while Billy and Roland Weary are walking after being captured by the German soldiers: “Billy found the afternoon stingingly exciting. There was so much to see—dragon’s teeth, killing machines, corpses with bare feet that were blue and ivory. So it goes” (Vonnegut 65). This is a striking difference to the scene before. What was once describing a very mundane experience now describes a corpse—something deeply disturbing and traumatizing to see.

The next few quotes all come from the scene where Billy is about to be abducted by the Tralfamadorians (at the beginning of chapter 4). Once again, each mention of the “blue and ivory” seems normal and not at all associated with anything that happened during the war from Billy’s perspective:
“He felt spooky and luminous, felt as though he were wrapped in cool fur that was full of static electricity. He looked down at his bare feet. They were ivory and blue.” (Vonnegut 72)
“Billy Pilgrim padded downstairs on his blue and ivory feet.” (Vonnegut 73)
“Out he went, his blue and ivory feet crushing the wet salad of the lawn.” (Vonnegut 75)

“Blue and ivory” is also used when Billy is in the boxcar: “Listen—on the tenth night the peg was pulled out of the hasp on Billy’s boxcar door, and the door was opened. Billy Pilgrim was lying at an angle on the corner-brace, self-crucified, holding himself there with a blue and ivory claw hooked over the sill of the ventilator.” (Vonnegut 80).

The final time “blue and ivory” is used is the most disturbing to me. It is used to describe the corpse of the hobo in the boxcar:
 “They came to the prison railroad yard again. They had arrived on only two cars. They would depart far more comfortably on four. They saw the dead hobo again. He was frozen stiff in the weeds beside the track. He was in a fetal position, trying even in death to nestle like a spoon with the others. There were no others now. He was nestling with thin air and cinders. Somebody had taken his boots. His bare feet were blue and ivory. It was all right somehow, his being dead. So it goes” (Vonnegut 148).

 “Blue and ivory” bothers me just as much as “So it goes.” The blue and ivory feet specifically associate with death for the reader. However, Billy doesn’t explicitly draw these conclusions even though he should be able to. Fitting with his character, Billy simply seems to not care. He appears to think that death is not awful, in fact he excitedly characterizes the corpse as something to see and says that the death of the hobo was “all right somehow” (Vonnegut 148). Though he has experienced his entire life before, he does not appear to draw the connections between his own blue and ivory feet walking down the stairs and the feet of the dead hobo. And while this is consistent with the Tralfamadorian ideas about death and time, it still disturbs me a lot (which is Vonnegut’s point, I guess).

Friday, March 2, 2018

Earline


We touched briefly on Earline’s role in Mumbo Jumbo during class and this post is a product of my thoughts on that.

Jes Grew is a phenomenon spread by the youth. One of the main issues the white people (and the Atonists) have with Jes Grew is that teens are getting into it as a form of rebellion. The only named white person in rebellion of Atonist beliefs, other than the dancing hordes affected by Jes Grew, is Thor Wintergreen, whose foray into the Mu’tafikah ends after he gives the rest of the group up to Biff Musclewhite. He starts out very committed to the Mu’tafikah, but eventually he is forced/convinced to go back to the dominant Atonist culture.
   
Earline seems to be the equivalent youth that doesn’t fit in with Jes Grew. Although she works for Papa LaBas, she is skeptical of his ideas and methods in the beginning, saying to LaBas, “There you go jabbering again… Your conspiratorial hypothesis about some secret society molding the consciousness of the West. You know you don’t have any empirical evidence for it that; you can’t prove….” (Reed 25). She obviously isn’t totally convinced of LaBas’ ideas about the Wallflower Order. She also says to LaBas that, “We need scientists and engineers, we need lawyers” (Reed 26). With the emphasis on fact and order, Earline’s ideas mix more with those of Atonism that those of Jes Grew. However, after Papa LaBas talking with her for a short paragraph, she breaks down, revealing that she’s stressed because of Berbelang. This breakdown reminded me a bit of Thor’s, but the circumstances are not as dire.

By the end of the book, however, Earline has changed, saying to LaBas that she’s “thinking about going to New Orleans and Haiti, Brazil and all over the South studying our ancient cultures, our HooDoo cultures. Maybe by and by some future artists 30 to 40 years from now will benefit from my research. Who knows. Pop, I believe in Jes Grew now” (Reed 206). Throughout the book, Earline commits herself to the idea of Jes Grew. However, rather than being forced to agree with Jes Grew, she is persuaded through her possession by a loa and Papa LaBas’ story.

Earline plays a background role, but nonetheless one that is very important. In my opinion, in addition to being one of the youths convinced by Papa LaBas, Earline shows the advancement of the reader’s perspective while reading Mumbo Jumbo. In the beginning, she has an Atonist background and is merely asking for some clarity, similar to what readers are thinking. By the end, she, as well as readers, have been relatively convinced that Jes Grew and Papa LaBas’ ideas are legitimate. Where we leave Earline is also significant. She invites Papa LaBas to a play “in Lafayette Theatre” called “Mumbo Jumbo Holiday” (Reed 206-207).  In class, we talked about how events in theaters are typically Atonist. Perhaps this is Reed’s way of reminding us that we are reading Mumbo Jumbo with an Atonist background and that we can't truly see Jes Grew in an unbiased way?

What do you think?

Milkman and Guitar

Please finish Song of Solomon  before reading because this blog post talks about spoilers! Guitar and Milkman begin Song of Solomon ...